Synaptwin

How we work

From diagnosis to adoption you can measure

The same five phases as on the front page — and below them, the engineering discipline that makes each one checkable.

  1. 1Align and diagnose

    Leadership agrees the value at stake; processes, the AI already in use and readiness are mapped on evidence.

    Measured by: a signed value floor and a readiness baseline

    The engine plus hands-on work

    Spine stages: Align · Discover · Diagnose

  2. 2Redesign the work

    The workflow is rebuilt around the AI: who decides, where a human reviews, how the team is sized.

    Measured by: decision rights signed by their owners

    The engine plus hands-on work

    Spine stages: Prioritize · Design

  3. 3Prove it in a governed pilot

    One high-value workflow, with EU AI Act classification, evidence and an audit trail built in.

    Measured by: cycle time and value against the floor

    The engine plus hands-on work

    Spine stages: Govern · Pilot · Deploy · Prove

  4. 4Bring people along

    Role-based learning, a champions network and team libraries of prompts and agents — so the new way of working is the one people use.

    Measured by: adoption per workflow

    Hands-on with your teams

    No engine stage yet — delivered hands-on with your teams.

  5. 5Scale what works

    Wins become standard modules with owners, an operating rhythm and a value ledger.

    Measured by: realised value, not seat licences

    The engine plus hands-on work

    Spine stages: Scale · Learn

Positioning

We take AI out of pilots and into the daily work of regulated organisations. That means redesigning the workflow the AI belongs in, agreeing who decides and who reviews, and bringing the people who do the work along. It also means governing it so it can scale, with each step ending in a record its owner signs.

Riaan has built AI products himself, voice and identity verification among them, so we know the technical side from the inside. But what decides whether AI is adopted is rarely the model; it is the operating environment around it. That is where we work.

Honesty proof VERIFIED on 2026-10-15 — 5 checks (typecheck, lint, tests, i18n parity, Archify doctor).

The differentiator

Not that we know AI — that we know how to make AI adoptable inside real organisations.

“Many AI projects fail because the model works but the operating environment does not. Our work focuses on the operating environment: identity, data, workflow, permissions, review, integration, deployment, and measurable acceptance.”

Business alignmentRequirements disciplineTechnical architectureIntegrationIdentityGovernanceHuman accountabilityAcceptance testingSecure deploymentOperational measurement

The engine behind this site is that way of working, made visible: every session ends in facts and signatures, every number has a source, and what is unknown is shown as unknown. It is how we work — not a licence we sell.

What an engagement delivers: AI your organisation uses, owns and can measure — not another pilot.

What the method promises

Predictable scaling — scoped right, priced right, delivered right.

Most organisations use AI somewhere; few have scaled it. What is missing is rarely the model — it is the operating model: how the work is sized, priced and signed. Cost comes down as a result of getting that right, not as the goal.

  1. 1Scoped right

    Each kind of work is sized by what it grows with: makers by the work, thinkers by the initiatives they hold at once, leads in whole people. No over-staffing, no under-staffing — and it says so when the answer is 'add'.

    See the same work counted both ways →
  2. 2Priced right

    Priced on the outcome, not the seats, with the margin set before signature and every assumption named. A price that holds as volume grows, because each part of the team has its own driver.

    See the offers →
  3. 3Delivered right

    Nothing moves on without the gate and the signature that owns it — what an agent may do, what a rule decides, what a person signs. The promise made in the room holds after it.

    See who signs what →

Underneath

The engineering discipline underneath

For the technical reader: the eleven-stage delivery spine, the architecture every engagement shares and the six gates — each listing the evidence held today.

The eleven-stage delivery spine
Seven room sessions and four delivery stages between them — each under a gate and a NIST AI RMF function.
  1. 1AlignSpecify · GovernNow
  2. 2DiscoverSpecify · MapLater
  3. 3DiagnoseSpecify · MapLater
  4. 4PrioritizeArchitect · MapLater
  5. 5DesignBuild · MeasureLaterThree laws of sizing →Today vs the laws →
  6. 6GovernBuild · Governdelivery
  7. 7PilotShip · Measuredelivery
  8. 8DeployShip · Managedelivery
  9. 9ProveReview · MeasureLater
  10. 10ScaleOperate and improve · ManageLater
  11. 11LearnOperate and improve · Governdelivery
One platform thesis, applied to different domains
Three layers of proof: products as evidence of the capability each layer needs.
Enterprise workflows
Voice-native enterprise workflowsfinancial services playbook
Agent orchestration, intent-to-action workflows, API integration
AI visual productionretail playbook
Creative workflow, asset governance, human approval, production scale
Quantum readinessuniversal core
Risk assessment, roadmap design, security and future-readiness
Agentic orchestration and control
Multi-agent coordination, task routing, state management
Identity, evidence and memory
Identity, voice fraud and deepfake riskfinancial services playbook
Authentication, authorization, liveness, identity governance
Evidence capture, validation, traceability, audit reporting
Context management, knowledge continuity, developer workflow integration
The common architecture
Each step is owned by a gate and has a place in this control plane — click to go there.
010/5 evidenced
Specify
Define Align · Diagnose
  • Business outcome
  • Users & stakeholders
  • Current process
  • Target workflow
  • Scope
  • Non-functional requirements
  • Data requirements
  • Risk classification
  • Acceptance criteria
  • Commercial assumptions
Evidence in OSDC today
Guided analysis complete (current process, users, volumes)
Requirement catalogue generated from a confirmed diagnosis
Assumptions register: 0/19 validated by a seat
Acceptance criteria agreed in the room (four tests)[ TO BE COMPLETED ]
Risk classification: 0 regulatory regime(s), 3-tier perimeter[ TO BE COMPLETED ]
021/4 evidenced
Architect
Define Model
  • System boundaries
  • Agent roles
  • Data flows
  • APIs
  • Identity
  • Permissions
  • RAG / knowledge sources
  • Human decision points
  • Failure modes
  • Monitoring
  • Deployment model
  • Security controls
Evidence in OSDC today
Verified system maps compiled in this session: 0/7 stages
Identity & permissions: 9 roles × 10 modules, default-deny
Human decision points: legal seat enrolled for Tier 3
Deployment model: client cloud (BYOK)[ TO BE COMPLETED ]
033/4 evidenced
Build
Implement Improve
  • Core workflows
  • Integrations
  • Agent tools
  • Permissions
  • User experience
  • Logging
  • Test harness
  • Configuration
  • Documentation
Evidence in OSDC today
7 agent plugins registered in the dsh runtime
SharePoint connector configured[ TO BE COMPLETED ]
Test harness green: 5 checks on 2026-10-15
Documentation: CLAUDE.md, specs, hive skills, this page
041/5 evidenced
Review
Validate Enable
  • Functional requirements
  • Security
  • Data handling
  • Prompt & model behaviour
  • Failure cases
  • Human escalation
  • Cost & latency
  • User acceptance
  • Operational readiness
Evidence in OSDC today
Honesty proof VERIFIED on 2026-10-15
Rehearsal run through: step 0/7[ TO BE COMPLETED ]
Refusals exercised in this session: 0[ TO BE COMPLETED ]
User acceptance: four tests agreed[ TO BE COMPLETED ]
Implementation-ready verdict passes
052/6 evidenced
Ship
Deploy Prove
  • On the customer's infrastructure
  • Approved keys & environments
  • With monitoring
  • With rollback
  • With runbooks
  • Ownership transferred
Evidence in OSDC today
AI compute on the client's tenant, zero retention verified[ TO BE COMPLETED ]
Keys as vault references, BYOK verified
Append-only ledgers and SIEM audit line on every action
Versioned snapshots published: 0[ TO BE COMPLETED ]
CISO checklist and connector runbook complete[ TO BE COMPLETED ]
Ownership: 0/0 seats named[ TO BE COMPLETED ]
060/5 evidenced
Operate and improve
Measure Scale
  • Adoption
  • Task completion
  • Accuracy
  • Exceptions
  • Cost
  • Latency
  • Incidents
  • Business value
  • Improvement opportunities
Evidence in OSDC today
Pilot measurements recorded: 0[ TO BE COMPLETED ]
Business value against the floor: [ TO BE COMPLETED ]
Exceptions: 3 open condition(s), 0 waived
Improvement backlog: 0 deferred condition(s) with revisit dates[ TO BE COMPLETED ]
Adoption: 0/0 seats held by named people[ TO BE COMPLETED ]

Stage 3 · Model → Stage 4 · Govern

Then the controls, their owners, and the evidence that proves they hold.